COMPARISON STUDY OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF REDBRICKS AND LIGHT BRICKS
Keywords:
Differences In Compressive Strength; Red Brick; Light BrickAbstract
The progress of development in Indonesia is very rapid, building materials are demanded tohave very good quality. The purpose of this study is to determine the comparison of the compressivestrength of red brick and lightweight brick as it should be in the field of development that affects economicdevelopment, in this study it is very useful for the community when buying materials. This type ofresearch is qualitative. The data was obtained by conducting research on data analysis techniques.used is to use a formula to determine the value of compressive strength. The results showed that redbricks and light bricks had different compressive strength values. Lightweight bricks which are heatedin the sun for 7 days have a compressive strength value of 58.916 kg/cm², while those that are soakedin water for 4 days have a compressive strength value of 36.256 kg/cm² and those which are blown inthe wind for 28 days have a compressive strength value of 45.32 kg/cm². cm². for red bricks that aredried for 5 days and then burned for 1 day. after the red bricks are ripe and then heated in the sun for 7days has a compressive strength value of 33,709 kg/cm² while those that are soaked for 4 days have acompressive strength value of 29,495 kg/cm² a
References
Algin, H. M. & P. Turgut. 2008. Cotton and
limestone powder wastes as brick material,”
Construction and Building Materials, 22(6),
1074–1080.
Ardi, Andi Wahyuni. 2016. Uji Kuat Tekan, Daya
Serap Air Dan Densitas Material Batu Bata
Dengan Penambahan Agregat Limbah Botol
Kaca. (skripsi) UIN Alauddin Makassar.
Aouba, L., Bories, C., Coutand, M., Perrin, B., &
Lemercier, H. 2016. Properties of fired clay
bricks with incorporated biomasses: Cases
of olive stone flour and wheat straw
residues.Constr. Build. Mater., 102, 7–1
Badan Standarisasi Nasional. 1989. Bata Beton
untuk Pasangan Dinding
Badan Standarisasi Nasional. 2002. Tentang Tata
Cara Perencanaan Struktur Beton Untuk
Bangunan Gedung.
BSN. 2000. Batu Merah Pejal Untuk Pasangan
Dinding. BSN, Jakarta
Cristawan. 2010. Perlakukan Bahan Bata Merah
Berserat Abu Sekam Padi, Teknik Sipil
Universitas Diponegoro, 1-3.
Daryanto. 1994. Pengetahuan Teknik Bangunan.
Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Djaelani, M. 2021. Social Community Participation
in Household Waste Management, Journal of
Social Science Studies, 1(1), 37-39.
Joglekar, S. N., R. A. Kharkar, S. A. Mandavgane,
& B. D. Kulkarni. 2018. Sustainability of brick
for low-cost housing: a comparison between
waste-based bricks and burnt clay bricks,
Sustainable Cities and Society, 37, 396–406.
Kua, H.W., & Kamath, S. 2014. An attributional
and consequential life cycle assessment of
substituting concrete with bricks. J. Clean.
Prod., 81, 190–200.
P.U, 1991, SNI 15 –2094 –1991 tentang Bata
Merah Pejal, Yayasan Badan Penerbit
Pekerjaan Umum, Jakarta.
Russ, W., Mörtel, H. & Meyer-Pittroff, R. 2005.
Application of spent grains to increase
porosity in bricks.Constr. Build. Mater.,19,
117–126.
SK SNI S-04-1989-F 1989 Ukuran Batu Bata
Standar, SNI (Standar Nasional indonesia).
SNI-03-2847-2002 Bata Ringan
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mohammad Djaelani, Didit Darmawan , Ella Anastasya Sinambela, Rahayu Mardikaningsih (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




