COMPARISON STUDY OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF REDBRICKS AND LIGHT BRICKS

Authors

  • Mohammad Djaelani Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Sunan Giri Surabaya Author
  • Didit Darmawan Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Sunan Giri Surabaya Author
  • Ella Anastasya Sinambela Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Sunan Giri Surabaya Author
  • Rahayu Mardikaningsih Rahayu Mardikaningsih Author

Keywords:

Differences In Compressive Strength; Red Brick; Light Brick

Abstract

The progress of development in Indonesia is very rapid, building materials are demanded tohave very good quality. The purpose of this study is to determine the comparison of the compressivestrength of red brick and lightweight brick as it should be in the field of development that affects economicdevelopment, in this study it is very useful for the community when buying materials. This type ofresearch is qualitative. The data was obtained by conducting research on data analysis techniques.used is to use a formula to determine the value of compressive strength. The results showed that redbricks and light bricks had different compressive strength values. Lightweight bricks which are heatedin the sun for 7 days have a compressive strength value of 58.916 kg/cm², while those that are soakedin water for 4 days have a compressive strength value of 36.256 kg/cm² and those which are blown inthe wind for 28 days have a compressive strength value of 45.32 kg/cm². cm². for red bricks that aredried for 5 days and then burned for 1 day. after the red bricks are ripe and then heated in the sun for 7days has a compressive strength value of 33,709 kg/cm² while those that are soaked for 4 days have acompressive strength value of 29,495 kg/cm² a

References

Algin, H. M. & P. Turgut. 2008. Cotton and

limestone powder wastes as brick material,”

Construction and Building Materials, 22(6),

1074–1080.

Ardi, Andi Wahyuni. 2016. Uji Kuat Tekan, Daya

Serap Air Dan Densitas Material Batu Bata

Dengan Penambahan Agregat Limbah Botol

Kaca. (skripsi) UIN Alauddin Makassar.

Aouba, L., Bories, C., Coutand, M., Perrin, B., &

Lemercier, H. 2016. Properties of fired clay

bricks with incorporated biomasses: Cases

of olive stone flour and wheat straw

residues.Constr. Build. Mater., 102, 7–1

Badan Standarisasi Nasional. 1989. Bata Beton

untuk Pasangan Dinding

Badan Standarisasi Nasional. 2002. Tentang Tata

Cara Perencanaan Struktur Beton Untuk

Bangunan Gedung.

BSN. 2000. Batu Merah Pejal Untuk Pasangan

Dinding. BSN, Jakarta

Cristawan. 2010. Perlakukan Bahan Bata Merah

Berserat Abu Sekam Padi, Teknik Sipil

Universitas Diponegoro, 1-3.

Daryanto. 1994. Pengetahuan Teknik Bangunan.

Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Djaelani, M. 2021. Social Community Participation

in Household Waste Management, Journal of

Social Science Studies, 1(1), 37-39.

Joglekar, S. N., R. A. Kharkar, S. A. Mandavgane,

& B. D. Kulkarni. 2018. Sustainability of brick

for low-cost housing: a comparison between

waste-based bricks and burnt clay bricks,

Sustainable Cities and Society, 37, 396–406.

Kua, H.W., & Kamath, S. 2014. An attributional

and consequential life cycle assessment of

substituting concrete with bricks. J. Clean.

Prod., 81, 190–200.

P.U, 1991, SNI 15 –2094 –1991 tentang Bata

Merah Pejal, Yayasan Badan Penerbit

Pekerjaan Umum, Jakarta.

Russ, W., Mörtel, H. & Meyer-Pittroff, R. 2005.

Application of spent grains to increase

porosity in bricks.Constr. Build. Mater.,19,

117–126.

SK SNI S-04-1989-F 1989 Ukuran Batu Bata

Standar, SNI (Standar Nasional indonesia).

SNI-03-2847-2002 Bata Ringan

Downloads

Published

2026-01-06