Keraton Indonesia Antara Pelestarian Budaya Dan Modernitas

Anak Agung Ngurah Agung Wira Bima Wikrama

Abstract


The palace as a traditional cultural heritage of Indonesia experiences cultural tension
along with the occurrence of modernity in Indonesia. Modernization has marginalized the role and
function of the Palace as the center of traditional power. Conversely, efforts to build the existence of
the Palace can be questioned about its relevance or merely cultural romance. For this reason, this
study examines three main problems. First, why does the Keraton preserve the Keraton Culture in
Indonesia? Second, how are the forms of preservation of Keraton Culture in Indonesia? Third, what
are the implications of the Keraton Cultural Preservation in Indonesia? These three problems are
examined with three theories, namely the theory of social change, cultural adaptation, and genetic
structuralism. The research method used is qualitative research with three data collection techniques,
namely observation, interviews, and document studies. Data were analyzed with descriptiveinterpretative
techniques through three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation, and drawing
conclusions. The results show that the reasons underlying the preservation of the Keraton Culture in Indonesia include rebuilding the existence of the Palace, maintaining the status quo, structural
differentiation, and the charm of modern life. The forms of preservation of Keraton Culture include
(1) passive preservation, namely the construction of the physical structure of Keratondan and
maintaining the attributes of royal identity; (2) active preservation, i.e. optimizing capital owned by
the Palace with specific patterns and specific goals in the structure of modern society; and (3)
Keraton network preservation, namely strengthening collegial collective systems and network
expansion. Implications of Keraton Cultural Preservation in social life include reformulation of
social relations and shifting the patron-client system. The implication in cultural life is in the form of
strengthening Keratonsas cultural heritage and strengthening Keratonsas the center of cultural
development.

Keywords


Palace, Cultural Preservation, Modernity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, Irwan. 2006. Konstruksi dan

Reproduksi Kebudayaan.

Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Afifuddin, H, dan Beni Ahmad Saebani.

Metodologi Penelitian

Kualitatif. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Agastia, IBG. 2006. Cokorda Mantuk Ring

Rana Pemimpin Yang Nyastra.

Denpasar: Yayasan Dharma Sastra.

Agung, Anak Agung Putra. Et.al. 1999.

Puputan Badung 20 September

: Perjuangan Raja dan Rakyat

Badung Melawan Kolonialisme

Belanda. Jakarta: Departemen

Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.

Agung, Ida Anak Agung Gde. 1989. Bali

Abad XIX: Perjuangan Rakyat dan

Raja-raja Menentang Kolonialisme

Belanda 1808 – 1908. Yogyakarta:

Gadjah Mada University Press.

Al-Barry, Dahlan Yacum M. 2001. Kamus

Sosiologi Antropologi. Surabaya:

Indah.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur

Penelitian Sebuah Pendekatan

Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bennet, John. 1976. The Ecological

Transition, Cultural Anthropology

& Human Adaptation. New York:

Pergamon Press.

Berger, Peter L. 1994. Langit Suci: Agama

Sebagai Realitas Sosial

(terjemahan: TheSacred Canopy),

Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES.

Bourdieu, Piere. 2010. Aneka Produksi

Kultural Sebuah Kajian Sosiologi

Budaya. Yogyakarta: Kreasi

Wacana.

Creese, Helen. 2006. Seabad Puputan

Badung Perspektif Belanda dan

Bali. Denpasar: Pustaka Larasan

Bekerjasama Dengan KITLV

Jakarta dan Fakultas Sastra UNUD.

Daeng, Hans J. 2008. Manusia,

Kebudayaan, dan Lingkungan

Tinjauan Antropologis.

Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2005.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.

Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Giddens, Anthony. 2005. Konsekuensi-

Konsekuensi Modernitas

(penterjemah:

Nurhadi).Yogyakarta: Kreasi

Wacana.

Harker, Richard; Cheeelen Mahar; Chris

Wilkes. 2009. (Habitus x Modal) +

Ranah = Praktik, Pengantar Paling

Komprehensif Kepada Pemikiran

Pierre Bourdieu. Yogyakarta:

Jalasutra.

Kaplan, David & Robert.A. Manners. 2002.

Teori Kebudayaan. Jakarta:

Pustaka Pelajar.

Konta, A.A. Alit. Tt. Kidung Puputan

Badung (Bandana Pralaya).

Denpasar.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47532/jic.v3i1.139

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawarti Indexed By :

Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawarti site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY-SA

 

View My Stats